Tag: islam

  • We Questioned Catholicism. We Must Scrutinise Islam Too.

    There is one issue I keep coming back to, and that is the covering of women and girls.

    I understand that some adult Muslim women will say that wearing the hijab is their choice, and I do not believe the state should tell an adult woman what she may or may not wear. But I also think we have become too reluctant to ask what’s behind that choice.

    Because choice is not always as simple as saying, “I chose this.”

    If removing the hijab would mean conflict with your family, rejection by your community, shame, intimidation, or fear, then we should at least be honest enough to ask how free that choice really is.

    And for me, the question becomes even more difficult when we are talking about girls.

    I struggle with seeing a young girl covered for reasons of modesty while boys of the same age run around without the same restrictions. What exactly are we teaching her?

    Why is the girl being asked to cover herself?

    If the concern is the way men or boys might look at women and girls, then surely the responsibility should be placed on the person doing the looking. Men should control their eyes and their behaviour. A girl should not grow up believing that her body is something that has to be hidden in order to manage somebody else’s thoughts.

    That is an unequal burden, and we should be able to say so.

    A young girl does not make religious decisions with the independence of an adult. She learns what is expected of her from the people she depends on. If girls are taught from childhood that modesty requires them to cover themselves in ways that boys do not, I think a society committed to equality has every right to question that.

    That is not the same as attacking Muslims.

    Nor do I believe every Muslim thinks alike. Islam is a vast religion encompassing people with completely different attitudes to democracy, women’s rights, secularism and religious law. Many Muslims want exactly the same freedoms that I do.

    But political Islam is something different. When religious doctrine becomes a political project, when it is used to determine law, restrict speech, control women’s behaviour, punish people for leaving a religion, or demand authority over individual freedom, then we should be prepared to oppose it.

    These beliefs and practices are not beyond criticism simply because they are rooted in Islam.

    Ireland eventually learned to question the authority of the Catholic Church. We learned, painfully, what can happen when religious teachings about women, sexuality and family life are given too much power and too little scrutiny.

    It would be a strange lesson to take from that history if we concluded that Catholic doctrines may be challenged, but that Islam where it extends beyond private faith into law, politics, gender roles, education, and social norms must be treated with silence.

    The principle should be the same for everyone.

    An adult woman should be free to wear a hijab. But she must be equally free to take it off. And a girl should be free not to wear one in the first place.

    She should be able to change her mind and reject the teaching behind it.

    She should even be able to leave Islam entirely.

    And she should be able to do all of those things without threats, punishment, intimidation or being cast out.

    That, to me, is the real test of freedom.

    Not whether someone is permitted to obey a religious rule, but whether they are genuinely free to say no.

  • Europe as a Practice: A PeaceCraft Reflection on the Future of the Continent

    Europe was born many times — from the ashes of empire, from the silence after wars, from the courage to imagine cooperation where there had only been conquest – and is still becoming. Yet peace on paper has never been enough. Europe can’t only be governed; it must be crafted.

    1. Europe as Conscious Strength

    Europe knows that power without ethics corrodes, and ethics without courage collapses. Europe condemns power politics in others while becoming more comfortable exercising power itself.

    2. Europe as Listening

    We talk too much and understand too little. The continent that invented diplomacy must rediscover the art of deep listening. Listening is not only openness to the world; it is the willingness to hear uncomfortable truths from one’s own citizens.

    3. Europe as Home

    Europe’s challenge is not only political fragmentation, but the erosion of familiarity and shared rhythms of life. Cohesion weakens when people no longer recognise the places they call home.

    4. Europe as Stewardship

    Our relationship with the Earth must mature from extraction to guardianship. With realism, sustainability can become a cultural instinct. Europe must learn to protect the land without pricing ordinary people out of life. The forests of Scandinavia, the fields of France, and the rivers of the Balkans are not only landscapes to preserve; they are part of how Europeans live.

    5. Europe as Bridge

    Europe often speaks the language of values while acting through fear, dependency, or strategic interest. A continent uncertain of itself struggles to build stable relationships with others.

    6. Europe as Healer of History

    Europe must learn to speak about itself truthfully: no myth-making, no permanent guilt, and no selective memory. Its history contains empire, colonisation, and oppression, but also resilience, invention, struggle, and renewal. A people given stories instead of truth eventually lose confidence in who they are.

    7. Europe as Culture

    Europe often treats culture as entertainment or status, rather than inheritance. Yet culture is where values are transmitted, memory is preserved, and belonging is formed. A society that neglects culture eventually loses confidence in itself.

    8. Europe as Deep Democracy

    Democracy is more than elections; it depends on the freedom to question, dissent, and disagree. Citizens do not lose trust only when they are ignored, but when they feel certain concerns cannot be voiced at all. Europe needs less managed consensus and more honest conversation.

    9. Europe as Secular Courage

    Europe must be willing to examine Islam as more than private faith. Its foundational texts and traditions address law, government, punishment, family life, social order, and relations between believers and non-believers. When these teachings are advanced as rules for the wider society, they become political claims and must be scrutinised accordingly.

    Freedom of religion protects the individual’s right to believe, worship, question, convert, or leave. It does not oblige a secular society to accommodate religious authority over civil law, freedom of expression, equality between women and men, children’s rights, sexual freedom, or democratic government.

    Europe should not protect Islam from criticism. Ideas do not possess rights. Europe has spent generations questioning its Christian institutions, confronting fascism and communism, and distrusting nationalism. Yet Islam is often approached with a caution that can become intellectual appeasement. Criticism of Islamic doctrine is too readily recast as hostility towards Muslims, giving ideas a protection that people—not belief systems—should possess. Islam must be open to the same rigorous scrutiny Europe has already directed towards its own religious and political inheritance.

    Peaceful coexistence cannot depend on silence. It requires a clear civic settlement in which one law applies to everyone, no sacred text stands above democratic scrutiny, and no accusation of offence is allowed to become a veto over inquiry. Europe can welcome people from every background without surrendering the secular freedoms that make such coexistence possible.

    10. Europe as Human

    Europe likes to imagine itself as a sanctuary for reflection, compassion and human values. Yet people increasingly experience precarity, isolation and pressure. Ideals mean little when everyday life becomes unaffordable, fragmented or rootless.

    Vulnerability should not be assigned according to migration status. Newcomers may be vulnerable, but so are citizens living with poverty, housing insecurity, inadequate services and the consequences of decisions about which they were never meaningfully consulted. Compassion that overlooks the people already struggling is not social justice; it merely redistributes neglect.

    Governments have a primary democratic responsibility to the people they govern. That responsibility includes protecting social cohesion, access to housing and services, public safety, and citizens’ ability to influence major changes affecting their communities. When these duties are neglected while rapid migration is presented as an unquestionable moral obligation, people may reasonably feel that the social contract has been breached.

    A government does not prove its humanity by extending compassion abroad while abandoning responsibility at home. A humane Europe must be capable of protecting people seeking refuge without treating its own citizens as obstacles to compassion. Human dignity cannot be sustained through selective empathy.

    11. Europe as PeaceCraft

    Europe was built from the ruins of war, yet increasingly speaks the language of power. Security matters, but a continent that forgets diplomacy loses something of its purpose. Peace is not weakness, nor is it naïveté. It is the difficult work of negotiation before conflict becomes irreversible.

    PeaceCraft does not ask Europe to avoid conflict by refusing to name it. It asks the continent to establish the terms of peaceful coexistence clearly: one civil law for everyone, freedom of belief and disbelief, equality between women and men, protection of children, open criticism of every ideology, controlled borders, democratic consent and reciprocal integration. These are not expressions of hostility. They are the boundaries that allow difference to exist without becoming domination.

    Peace is not maintained by asking only the established population to accommodate, or only newcomers to surrender their inheritance. It requires reciprocity—but reciprocity does not mean that every value is negotiable. A democratic society may welcome cultural difference while refusing coercion, parallel authority and any doctrine claiming supremacy over civil freedom.

    Conclusion: The Next Renaissance

    Europe will not renew itself through slogans, nostalgia, guilt, or managed consensus. It will renew itself through honesty: about power, history, belonging, limits, and what holds societies together. A continent uncertain of itself struggles to offer anything to the world. Europe does not need to become something new. It may first need to remember what it is.